
Xeon W-3225 vs EPYC 4124P

Xeon W-3225

EPYC 4124P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3225
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4124P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3225 | EPYC 4124P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3225 | EPYC 4124P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 4124P

Xeon W-3225
The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.

EPYC 4124P
The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3225 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4124P offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W-3225 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 versus 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P — a 14.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon W-3225 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 4124P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3225 scores 18,251 against the EPYC 4124P's 18,139 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-3225. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 10,500 (9.1% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,150 vs 1,962, a 52.2% lead for the EPYC 4124P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,100 vs 1,898 (131% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). L3 cache: 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P.
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | EPYC 4124P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB | 32 MB (total)+94% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 18,251 | 18,139 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,500+10% | 10,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,150 | 1,962+71% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,100+379% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3225 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4124P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3225 versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4124P — the EPYC 4124P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3225 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3225) vs 2 (EPYC 4124P). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3225) vs 28 (EPYC 4124P) — the Xeon W-3225 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3225) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4124P).
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | EPYC 4124P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+433% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+129% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P). The EPYC 4124P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3225 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation, EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X; EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T.
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | EPYC 4124P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | Workstation | Entry Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















