Xeon W3520 vs Xeon X5492 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon W3520 vs Xeon X5492 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon W3520 vs Xeon X5492: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon W3520
2009Why buy it
- β +1% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5492 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $284 MSRP, while Xeon X5492 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon X5492
2008Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,912 vs 2,940).
- β15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W3520 better than Xeon X5492?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W3520 vs Xeon X5492 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon W3520
The Xeon W3520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008β2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,940 points. Launch price was $404.

Xeon X5492
The Xeon X5492 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,912 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon W3520 is built on the Bloomfield (2008β2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon W3520 scores 2,940 against the Xeon X5492's 2,912 β a 1% lead for the Xeon W3520. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3520 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5492.
| Feature | Xeon W3520 | Xeon X5492 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | β |
| Boost Clock | 2.93 GHz | β |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz | 3.4 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12 MB L2 Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | β |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008β2010) | β |
| PassMark | 2,940 | 2,912 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W3520 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5492 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon W3520 | Xeon X5492 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














