
Athlon Silver 3050e

Xeon W3520
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Xeon W3520 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Xeon W3520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Cyberpunk 2077
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Xeon W3520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver 3050e
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $184 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 187.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 130W, a 129W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3520 across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3520, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon W3520
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,940 vs 2,979).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($284 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌12900% higher power demand at 130W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver 3050e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Silver 3050e better than Xeon W3520?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Xeon W3520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver 3050e
The Athlon Silver 3050e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W3520
The Xeon W3520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,940 points. Launch price was $404.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver 3050e packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3520 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3520 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus 2.93 GHz on the Xeon W3520 — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W3520 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3520 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050e scores 2,979 against the Xeon W3520's 2,940 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon Silver 3050e. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon Silver 3050e vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3520.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.93 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.66 GHz+90% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,979+1% | 2,940 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 758 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,494 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3520 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon Silver 3050e) / not specified (Xeon W3520). The Athlon Silver 3050e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon W3520 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Silver 3050e was priced at $100, while the Xeon W3520 came in at $284. On launch pricing ($100 vs $284), Athlon Silver 3050e was $184 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver 3050e delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W3520 — making the Athlon Silver 3050e the 96.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-65% | $284 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.8+187% | 10.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















