Xeon W5580
VS
Phenom II X6 1075T

Xeon W5580 vs Phenom II X6 1075T

Intel

Xeon W5580

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Phenom II X6 1075T

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W5580 is positioned at rank 657 and the Phenom II X6 1075T is on rank 145, so the Phenom II X6 1075T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W5580

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12013%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2268%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2015%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1557%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
99%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
99%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
98%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
98%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
98%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
97%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
97%
#657
Xeon W5580
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
97%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X6 1075T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
2672%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
2525%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
1833%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
552%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
437%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
383%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
219%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
216%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
197%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
197%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
195%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
189%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
187%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
186%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
184%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
100%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
98%
#145
Phenom II X6 1075T
MSRP: $245|Avg: N/A
100%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
98%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
98%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
97%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
97%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
97%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
96%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
96%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
96%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
96%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
96%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W5580 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W5580Phenom II X6 1075T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($245)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gainestown (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Thuban (2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X6 1075T ($245), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($245 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W5580Phenom II X6 1075T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($245)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W5580 and Phenom II X6 1075T

Intel

Xeon W5580

The Xeon W5580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,459 points. Launch price was $102.

AMD

Phenom II X6 1075T

The Phenom II X6 1075T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $260.

Processing Power

The Xeon W5580 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1075T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1075T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W5580 versus 3.5 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1075T — a 1.1% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1075T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon W5580 uses the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1075T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W5580 scores 3,459 against the Phenom II X6 1075T's 3,500 — a 1.2% lead for the Phenom II X6 1075T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W5580 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1075T.

FeatureXeon W5580Phenom II X6 1075T
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
3.5 GHz+1%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Gainestown (2009−2010)
Thuban (2010)
PassMark
3,459
3,500+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,896
Geekbench 6 Single
679
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,960
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W5580 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X6 1075T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W5580Phenom II X6 1075T
Socket
LGA1366
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W5580) / AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1075T). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1075T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Phenom II X6 1075T rivals Core i5-750.

FeatureXeon W5580Phenom II X6 1075T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming