Xeon W5580
VS
Core i3-4160

Xeon W5580 vs Core i3-4160

Intel

Xeon W5580

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i3-4160

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W5580 is positioned at rank 657 and the Core i3-4160 is on rank 596, so the Core i3-4160 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W5580

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12013%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2268%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2015%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1557%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
99%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
99%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
98%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
98%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
98%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
97%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
97%
#657
Xeon W5580
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
97%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4160

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10401%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9828%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7136%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2150%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1703%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1490%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
853%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
842%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
767%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
767%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
758%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
738%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
727%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
724%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
718%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
100%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
100%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
99%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
98%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
98%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
97%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W5580 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W5580Core i3-4160
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($52)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gainestown (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-4160 ($52), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($52 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W5580Core i3-4160
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($52)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W5580 and Core i3-4160

Intel

Xeon W5580

The Xeon W5580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,459 points. Launch price was $102.

Intel

Core i3-4160

The Core i3-4160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $133.

Processing Power

The Xeon W5580 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-4160 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon W5580 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W5580 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4160 — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i3-4160 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon W5580 uses the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-4160 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W5580 scores 3,459 against the Core i3-4160's 3,506 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i3-4160. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W5580 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160.

FeatureXeon W5580Core i3-4160
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
3.6 GHz+4%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+167%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Gainestown (2009−2010)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,459
3,506+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W5580 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4160 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W5580Core i3-4160
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W5580) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160). The Core i3-4160 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Xeon W5580 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160 rivals FX-6300.

FeatureXeon W5580Core i3-4160
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget Desktop