Xeon w9-3595X vs EPYC 9474F
Xeon w9-3595X
EPYC 9474F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9474F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) | ✅ More affordable ($3,723) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+69%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) | ✅ More affordable ($3,723) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w9-3595X and EPYC 9474F
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
EPYC 9474F
The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.
Processing Power
The Xeon w9-3595X packs 60 cores / 120 threads, while the EPYC 9474F offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon w9-3595X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9474F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w9-3595X scores 97,534 against the EPYC 9474F's 102,255 — a 4.7% lead for the EPYC 9474F. L3 cache: 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 60 / 120+25% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+17% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+80% |
| L3 Cache | 112.5 MB | 256 MB (total)+128% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 97,534 | 102,255+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 130,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,118 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w9-3595X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9474F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w9-3595X) vs 12 (EPYC 9474F). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) vs 128 (EPYC 9474F) — the EPYC 9474F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w9-3595X) and SP5 (EPYC 9474F).
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 6 TB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112 | 128+14% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Xeon w9-3595X) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9474F). Primary use case: Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation, EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized. Direct competitor: Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX; EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | High-end Workstation | Data Center / Performance Optimized |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w9-3595X launched at $5889 MSRP, while the EPYC 9474F debuted at $6780. At current prices ($6000 vs $3723), the EPYC 9474F is $2277 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w9-3595X delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9474F — making the EPYC 9474F the 51.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5889-13% | $6780 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $6000 | $3723-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3 | 27.5+69% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon w9-3595X and EPYC 9474F
