Xeon w9-3595X vs EPYC 9734
Xeon w9-3595X
EPYC 9734
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9734
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($6,000) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,598) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Bergamo (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+5%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($6,000) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,598) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w9-3595X and EPYC 9734
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
EPYC 9734
The EPYC 9734 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 112 cores and 224 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 102,286 points. Launch price was $9,600.
Processing Power
The Xeon w9-3595X packs 60 cores / 120 threads, while the EPYC 9734 offers 112 cores / 224 threads — the EPYC 9734 has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 9734 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon w9-3595X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9734 uses Bergamo (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w9-3595X scores 97,534 against the EPYC 9734's 102,286 — a 4.8% lead for the EPYC 9734. L3 cache: 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9734.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 60 / 120 | 112 / 224+87% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+60% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 112.5 MB | 256 MB (total)+128% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Bergamo (2023) |
| PassMark | 97,534 | 102,286+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 130,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,118 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w9-3595X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9734 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w9-3595X) vs 12 (EPYC 9734). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) vs 128 (EPYC 9734) — the EPYC 9734 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w9-3595X) and SP5 (EPYC 9734).
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 6 TB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112 | 128+14% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Xeon w9-3595X) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9734). Primary use case: Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation, EPYC 9734 targets Data Center / High Density. Direct competitor: Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX; EPYC 9734 rivals Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | High-end Workstation | Data Center / High Density |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w9-3595X launched at $5889 MSRP, while the EPYC 9734 debuted at $9600. At current prices ($6000 vs $6598), the Xeon w9-3595X is $598 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w9-3595X delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 15.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9734 — making the Xeon w9-3595X the 4.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5889-39% | $9600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $6000-9% | $6598 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+5% | 15.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon w9-3595X and EPYC 9734
