Xeon X3370
VS
Core i5-3230M

Xeon X3370 vs Core i5-3230M

VS
Intel

Core i5-3230M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X3370 is positioned at rank 787 and the Core i5-3230M is on rank 30, so the Core i5-3230M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3370

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
16338%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3085%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2741%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2117%
#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
99%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
98%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
98%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
96%
#787
Xeon X3370
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#796
Xeon E-2276M
MSRP: $939|Avg: $124
98%
#797
Xeon W3580
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
97%
#798
Xeon W3690
MSRP: $583|Avg: $140
97%
#800
Xeon E5-2428L
MSRP: $692|Avg: $42
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3230M

#18
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
172%
#19
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
169%
#20
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
155%
#21
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
155%
#22
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
153%
#24
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
148%
#25
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
142%
#26
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
142%
#27
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
138%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
100%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
100%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
99%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
97%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
90%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
89%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3370 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X3370Core i5-3230M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($13)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3230M ($13), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($13 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X3370Core i5-3230M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($13)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X3370 and Core i5-3230M

Intel

Xeon X3370

The Xeon X3370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,544 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-3230M

The Core i5-3230M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,565 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3230M is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X3370 scores 2,544 against the Core i5-3230M's 2,565 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-3230M. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3370 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3230M.

FeatureXeon X3370Core i5-3230M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+15%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache+300%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,544
2,565
Geekbench 6 Single
565
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,128
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X3370 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3230M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X3370Core i5-3230M
Socket
LGA775
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X3370) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3230M). The Core i5-3230M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon X3370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3230M targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-3230M rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeatureXeon X3370Core i5-3230M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming