Xeon X3380 vs Core i3-7102E
Xeon X3380
Core i3-7102E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X3380 is positioned at rank 783 and the Core i3-7102E is on rank 974, so the Xeon X3380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3380
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7102E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X3380 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X3380 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X3380 and Core i3-7102E
Xeon X3380
The Xeon X3380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.16 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,568 points. Launch price was $800.
Core i3-7102E
The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7102E is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X3380 scores 2,568 against the Core i3-7102E's 2,599 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-7102E. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3380 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E.
| Feature | Xeon X3380 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.16 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB L2 Cache+300% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | — | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,568 | 2,599+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 659 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X3380) / Yes (Core i3-7102E). The Core i3-7102E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X3380 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Xeon X3380 | Core i3-7102E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X3380 and Core i3-7102E
