Xeon X3380 vs Xeon X5460

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon X3380 vs Xeon X5460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon X3380 vs Xeon X5460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon X3380

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,568 vs 2,582).

Xeon X5460

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3380 better than Xeon X5460?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon X3380 is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5460 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X3380 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X3380 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon X3380 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon X3380 vs Xeon X5460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon X3380

The Xeon X3380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.16 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,568 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X5460

The Xeon X5460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.16 GHz, with boost up to 0.17 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,582 points. Launch price was $1,172.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon X5460 is built on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X3380 scores 2,568 against the Xeon X5460's 2,582 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5460. Both processors carry 12 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon X3380	Xeon X5460
Cores / Threads	—	4 / 4
Boost Clock	—	0.17 GHz
Base Clock	3.16 GHz	3.16 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB L2 Cache	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	—	6 MB (total)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	—	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,568	2,582

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X3380 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5460 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.