Xeon X5675
VS
FX-9370

Xeon X5675 vs FX-9370

Intel

Xeon X5675

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2011
VS
AMD

FX-9370

8 Cores8 Thrd220 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5675 is positioned at rank 998 and the FX-9370 is on rank 61, so the FX-9370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5675

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
46597%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
8798%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
7817%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
6039%
#537
Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2363
86%
#538
Xeon Platinum 8280M
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $6223
84%
#539
Xeon Platinum 8280
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2940
83%
#540
Xeon E7-8891 v3
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $418
71%
#998
Xeon X5675
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $22
100%
#999
Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP: $1881|Avg: $150
87%
#1000
Xeon D-1567
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
87%
#1001
Xeon E-2126G
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
87%
#1004
Xeon D-1531
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $250
84%
#1005
Xeon 5130
MSRP: $316|Avg: $10
83%
#1007
Xeon E5-4640 v3
MSRP: $2859|Avg: $300
81%
#1008
Xeon E5440
MSRP: $690|Avg: $37
77%
#1009
Xeon E5-2643
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $50
76%
#1010
Xeon E5-2637
MSRP: $885|Avg: $40
75%
#1011
Xeon W3570
MSRP: $999|Avg: $15
73%
#1013
Xeon E5-4620
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $400
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-9370

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
2054%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1941%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
1409%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
425%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
336%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
294%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
168%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
166%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
151%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
151%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
150%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
146%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
144%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
143%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
142%
#59
Core i5-9500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $65
100%
#60
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
99%
#61
FX-9370
MSRP: $42|Avg: $60
100%
#61
Core i9-9960X
MSRP: $1684|Avg: $200
99%
#62
Core Ultra 5 225T
MSRP: $240|Avg: $180
98%
#63
Ryzen 3 3300X
MSRP: $120|Avg: $90
98%
#64
Core i5-12600K
MSRP: $289|Avg: $185
98%
#65
Core Ultra 5 235
MSRP: $257|Avg: $269
98%
#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
98%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
98%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
97%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
97%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
96%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
96%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
96%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($22) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5675 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X5675FX-9370
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($22)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-9370 ($60), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($38 less, 173% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X5675FX-9370
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+175%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($22)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5675 and FX-9370

Intel

Xeon X5675

The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.

AMD

FX-9370

The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5675 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the FX-9370 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-9370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 versus 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 — a 30.4% clock advantage for the FX-9370 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Xeon X5675 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-9370 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5675 scores 6,418 against the FX-9370's 6,374 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon X5675.

FeatureXeon X5675FX-9370
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
4.7 GHz+36%
Base Clock
3.06 GHz
4.4 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
12288 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
8192 kB+3100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
6,418
6,374
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5675 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-9370 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X5675FX-9370
Socket
LGA1366
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675) / not specified (FX-9370). Primary use case: Xeon X5675 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureXeon X5675FX-9370
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon X5675 launched at $1440 MSRP, while the FX-9370 debuted at $42. At current prices ($22 vs $60), the Xeon X5675 is $38 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X5675 delivers 291.7 pts/$ vs 106.2 pts/$ for the FX-9370 — making the Xeon X5675 the 93.2% better value option.

FeatureXeon X5675FX-9370
MSRP
$1440
$42-97%
Avg Price (30d)
$22-63%
$60
Performance per Dollar
291.7+175%
106.2
Release Date
2011
2013