Xeon X5675 vs Ryzen 3 1200
Xeon X5675
Ryzen 3 1200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5675 is positioned at rank 998 and the Ryzen 3 1200 is on rank 366, so the Ryzen 3 1200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5675
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 1200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($22) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+128%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($22) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 3 1200
Xeon X5675
The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.
Ryzen 3 1200
The Ryzen 3 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,407 points. Launch price was $109.
Processing Power
The Xeon X5675 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 1200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5675 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1200 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5675 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon X5675 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5675 scores 6,418 against the Ryzen 3 1200's 6,407 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5675. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1200.
| Feature | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.46 GHz+2% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz | 3.1 GHz+1% |
| L3 Cache | 12288 kB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) |
| PassMark | 6,418 | 6,407 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,013 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X5675 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5675 versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 3 1200 — the Ryzen 3 1200 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5675) vs 2 (Ryzen 3 1200). Chipset compatibility: Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5675) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 3 1200).
| Feature | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2666+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 3+50% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 3 1200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1200). Primary use case: Xeon X5675 targets Workstation, Ryzen 3 1200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Xeon X5675 launched at $1440 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 1200 debuted at $109. At current prices ($22 vs $50), the Xeon X5675 is $28 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X5675 delivers 291.7 pts/$ vs 128.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1200 — making the Xeon X5675 the 77.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1440 | $109-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $22-56% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 291.7+128% | 128.1 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 3 1200
