Xeon X5675 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Xeon X5675
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon X5675 is positioned at rank #998 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5675
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($22) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($52) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+133%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($22) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($52) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Xeon X5675
The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon X5675 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5675 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G (base: 3.06 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon X5675 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5675 scores 6,418 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 6,499 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675 vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.
| Feature | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.46 GHz | 4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz | 3.6 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 12288 kB (total)+200% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 6,418 | 6,499+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X5675 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5675 versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5675) vs 2 (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G).
| Feature | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2933+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 3+50% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon X5675 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5675 targets Workstation, Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon X5675 launched at $1440 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G debuted at $89. At current prices ($22 vs $52), the Xeon X5675 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X5675 delivers 291.7 pts/$ vs 125.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — making the Xeon X5675 the 80% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon X5675 | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1440 | $89-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $22-58% | $52 |
| Performance per Dollar | 291.7+133% | 125.0 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
