Xeon X5690 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Xeon X5690
Ryzen 3 3200G
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon X5690 is positioned at rank #514 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5690
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 3200G
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X5690 | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($67) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X5690 | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+271%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($67) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5690 and Ryzen 3 3200G
Xeon X5690
The Xeon X5690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,031 points. Launch price was $205.
Ryzen 3 3200G
The Ryzen 3 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,999 points. Launch price was $99.
Processing Power
The Xeon X5690 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 3200G offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5690 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X5690 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200G — a 7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200G (base: 3.46 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon X5690 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3200G uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5690 scores 7,031 against the Ryzen 3 3200G's 6,999 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5690. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5690 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200G.
| Feature | Xeon X5690 | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.73 GHz | 4 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.46 GHz | 3.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 12288 kB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 7,031 | 6,999 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X5690 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 3200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5690 versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 3 3200G — the Ryzen 3 3200G supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5690) vs 2 (Ryzen 3 3200G). Chipset compatibility: Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5690) and AMD 300 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 3 3200G).
| Feature | Xeon X5690 | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2933+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 3+50% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5690) / not specified (Ryzen 3 3200G). The Ryzen 3 3200G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon X5690 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5690 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5690 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon X5690 | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon X5690 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 3200G debuted at $100. At current prices ($250 vs $67), the Ryzen 3 3200G is $183 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X5690 delivers 28.1 pts/$ vs 104.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 3200G — making the Ryzen 3 3200G the 115.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon X5690 | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $100-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $67-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.1 | 104.5+272% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X5690 and Ryzen 3 3200G
