Xeon X5690
VS
Core i3-9300

Xeon X5690 vs Core i3-9300

Intel

Xeon X5690

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.73 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-9300

4 Cores4 Thrd62 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon X5690 is positioned at rank #514 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5690

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7391%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1395%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1240%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
958%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
100%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
99%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
99%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
99%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
98%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
97%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
95%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
95%
#514
Xeon X5690
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-9300

#185
Core i5-10505
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
106%
#186
Ryzen 3 4300G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
105%
#187
Ryzen 9 3950X
MSRP: $749|Avg: $389
105%
#188
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
MSRP: $165|Avg: $165
104%
#189
Ryzen 7 4700GE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
104%
#190
Core i5-10400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $100
103%
#191
Core i5-10600KF
MSRP: $250|Avg: $145
103%
#192
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
103%
#193
Core i9-12900F
MSRP: $494|Avg: $370
102%
#194
Core i5-12400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $195
102%
#195
Ryzen 5 7400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
101%
#196
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $589
101%
#197
Ryzen 5 5600X3D
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
101%
#198
Core i3-9350KF
MSRP: $173|Avg: $80
100%
#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
100%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
100%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
99%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
98%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
97%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
97%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
97%
#206
Core i3-13100E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#207
Core i9-13900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $536
96%
#208
Processor 300
MSRP: $82|Avg: $80
96%
#209
Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $145
96%
#210
Ryzen 5 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $80
95%
#211
Core i9-14900KS
MSRP: $749|Avg: $670
95%
#212
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $384
94%
#213
Core i3-8100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
94%
#214
Core i7-13700E
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-9300 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon X5690Core i3-9300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($75)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon X5690 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon X5690Core i3-9300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+237%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5690 and Core i3-9300

Intel

Xeon X5690

The Xeon X5690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,031 points. Launch price was $205.

Intel

Core i3-9300

The Core i3-9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,105 points. Launch price was $143.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5690 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i3-9300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5690 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X5690 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-9300 — a 14.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-9300 (base: 3.46 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon X5690 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-9300 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5690 scores 7,031 against the Core i3-9300's 7,105 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-9300. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5690 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9300.

FeatureXeon X5690Core i3-9300
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.73 GHz
4.3 GHz+15%
Base Clock
3.46 GHz
3.7 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
12288 kB (total)+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
7,031
7,105+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,498
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,025
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5690 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-9300 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5690 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-9300 — the Core i3-9300 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5690) vs 2 (Core i3-9300). Chipset compatibility: Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5690) and LGA1151 (Core i3-9300).

FeatureXeon X5690Core i3-9300
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5690) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9300). The Core i3-9300 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X5690 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5690 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5690 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureXeon X5690Core i3-9300
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon X5690 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Core i3-9300 debuted at $143. At current prices ($250 vs $75), the Core i3-9300 is $175 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X5690 delivers 28.1 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-9300 — making the Core i3-9300 the 108.4% better value option.

FeatureXeon X5690Core i3-9300
MSRP
$250
$143-43%
Avg Price (30d)
$250
$75-70%
Performance per Dollar
28.1
94.7+237%
Release Date
2011
2019