A10-6790B vs Core Duo T2250

A10-6790B vs Core Duo T2250 Performance Spectrum

A10-6790B

4 / 4

1,546

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Duo T2250

2 / 2

1,537

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6790B vs Core Duo T2250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6790B vs Core Duo T2250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6790B

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Core Duo T2250 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Duo T2250.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core Duo T2250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4900% higher power demand at 100W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2250

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 100W, a 98W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6790B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,537 vs 1,546).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6790B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6790B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6790B better than Core Duo T2250?

Yes. A10-6790B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-6790B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6790B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6790B is the better buy right now. A10-6790B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-6790B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6790B vs Core Duo T2250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790B

The A10-6790B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $130.

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6790B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core Duo T2250 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-6790B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790B versus 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 — a 86.7% clock advantage for the A10-6790B (base: 4 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The A10-6790B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core Duo T2250 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790B scores 1,546 against the Core Duo T2250's 1,537 — a 0.6% lead for the A10-6790B.

Feature	A10-6790B	Core Duo T2250
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+153%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+131%	1.73 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+100%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,546	1,537

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6790B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6790B	Core Duo T2250
Socket	FM2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6790B) / not specified (Core Duo T2250). The A10-6790B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-6790B rivals Core i3-4330.