A10-6790B vs Core i7-9700K

CPU

GPU

A10-6790B

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2013

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Buy on Amazon

A10-6790B vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum

A10-6790B

4 / 4

1,546

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-9700K

8 / 8

14,397

+831.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6790B vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6790B vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6790B

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $263 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,546 vs 14,397).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +487.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 195.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 100W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
215.6% HIGHER MSRP
$385 MSRPvs$122 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6790B.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than A10-6790B?

Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 487.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 831.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 487.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 831.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in 215.6% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $122 MSRP, and it still gives you a 487.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 195.1% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 12.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6790B vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790B

The A10-6790B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6790B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790B versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A10-6790B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790B scores 1,546 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 161.2% lead for the Core i7-9700K.

Feature	A10-6790B	Core i7-9700K
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark	1,546	14,397+831%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6790B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6790B versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Core i7-9700K supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6790B) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

Feature	A10-6790B	Core i7-9700K
Socket	FM2	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2666+43%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6790B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6790B) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790B targets Office, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-6790B rivals Core i3-4330.

Feature	A10-6790B	Core i7-9700K
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8670D	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Office	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-6790B was priced at $122, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($122 vs $385), A10-6790B was $263 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-6790B delivers 12.7 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 98.8% better value option.

Feature	A10-6790B	Core i7-9700K
MSRP	$122-68%	$385
Performance per Dollar	12.7	37.4+194%
Release Date	2013	2018

Search A10-6790B on Amazon

Search Core i7-9700K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.