A10-6800K vs Xeon Gold 6262V

A10-6800K vs Xeon Gold 6262V Performance Spectrum

A10-6800K

4 / 4

3,186

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon Gold 6262V

24 / 48

3,155

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6800K vs Xeon Gold 6262V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6800K vs Xeon Gold 6262V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6800K

2013

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 100W instead of 135W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Xeon Gold 6262V needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6262V.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6262V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6262V, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.

Xeon Gold 6262V

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,155 vs 3,186).
❌35% higher power demand at 135W vs 100W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6800K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6800K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6800K better than Xeon Gold 6262V?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6262V makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-6800K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6800K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6800K still makes the most sense overall. A10-6800K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6262V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6800K vs Xeon Gold 6262V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6800K

The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.

Xeon Gold 6262V

The Xeon Gold 6262V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,155 points. Launch price was $2,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6262V offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262V has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262V — a 20% clock advantage for the A10-6800K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A10-6800K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6800K scores 3,186 against the Xeon Gold 6262V's 3,155 — a 1% lead for the A10-6800K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6800K vs 33 MB on the Xeon Gold 6262V.

Feature	A10-6800K	Xeon Gold 6262V
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	24 / 48+500%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+22%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+116%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	33 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB	24 MB+500%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	3,186	3,155
Geekbench 6 Single	477	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6800K	Xeon Gold 6262V
Socket	FM2	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6800K) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6262V). The A10-6800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Xeon Gold 6262V requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130.