A10-7890K vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7890K vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7890K vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7890K

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen Embedded V1202B needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V1202B.

Trade-offs

❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7890K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,512 vs 3,537).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A10-7890K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7890K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7890K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7890K better than Ryzen Embedded V1202B?

Yes. A10-7890K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7890K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7890K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7890K is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A10-7890K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1202B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V1202B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-7890K vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7890K

The A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,537 points. Launch price was $150.

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

The Ryzen Embedded V1202B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,512 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7890K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7890K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-7890K versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B — a 29.3% clock advantage for the A10-7890K (base: 4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A10-7890K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7890K scores 3,537 against the Ryzen Embedded V1202B's 3,512 — a 0.7% lead for the A10-7890K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7890K vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B.

Feature	A10-7890K	Ryzen Embedded V1202B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+34%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+74%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512K (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,537	3,512
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-7890K	Ryzen Embedded V1202B
Socket	FM2+	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7890K) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1202B). The A10-7890K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7890K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7890K rivals Core i3-6100.