A10-9700 vs Core i7-975

AMD

A10-9700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-975

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

A10-9700 vs Core i7-975 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700 vs Core i7-975 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700 vs Core i7-975: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 495.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.0 vs 3.5 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-975 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i7-975

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,527 vs 3,555).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while A10-9700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9700 better than Core i7-975?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-975 is ahead with a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A10-9700 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-9700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A10-9700 is the better buy right now. A10-9700 comes in $830 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-975 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 495.8% better value on MSRP (21.0 vs 3.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-9700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-9700 vs Core i7-975 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10-9700

The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i7-975

The Core i7-975 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,527 points. Launch price was $476.

Processing Power

The A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-975's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-975 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the A10-9700 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-975 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700 scores 3,555 against the Core i7-975's 3,527 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-9700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-975.

FeatureA10-9700Core i7-975
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+6%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+5%
3.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
3,555
3,527
Geekbench 6 Single
642
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-975 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10-9700Core i7-975
Socket
AM4
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9700) / not specified (Core i7-975). The A10-9700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i7-975 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureA10-9700Core i7-975
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-9700 was priced at $169, while the Core i7-975 came in at $999. On launch pricing ($169 vs $999), A10-9700 was $830 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9700 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 3.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-975 — making the A10-9700 the 142.5% better value option.

FeatureA10-9700Core i7-975
MSRP
$169-83%
$999
Performance per Dollar
21.0+500%
3.5
Release Date
2017
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.