
A10-9700

Ryzen 7 3700X
A10-9700 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-9700 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-9700 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-9700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,555 vs 22,430).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +225.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 224.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌94.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than A10-9700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-9700 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700
The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700 scores 3,555 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 145.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,555 | 22,430+531% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 642 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | A10-9700 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9700) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The A10-9700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10-9700 was priced at $169, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($169 vs $329), A10-9700 was $160 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9700 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 105.7% better value option.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-49% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0 | 68.2+225% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














