
A10-9700

Ryzen 9 5900X
A10-9700 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-9700 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-9700 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-9700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 5900X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,555 vs 38,955).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +263.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 237.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌224.9% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than A10-9700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-9700 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700
The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700 scores 3,555 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 166.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 642 vs 2,174, a 108.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 12 / 24+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 3,555 | 38,955+996% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 642 | 2,174+239% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | A10-9700 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A10-9700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700 targets Budget, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10-9700 was priced at $169, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($169 vs $549), A10-9700 was $380 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9700 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 108.5% better value option.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-69% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0 | 71.0+238% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














