
A10 PRO-7850B

Core i5-10400F
A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10 PRO-7850B
2014Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,441 vs 13,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +206.0% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $266 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 908.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 8.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A10 PRO-7850B.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10 PRO-7850B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than A10 PRO-7850B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7850B
The A10 PRO-7850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,441 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The A10 PRO-7850B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10 PRO-7850B versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10 PRO-7850B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7850B scores 3,441 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 116.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 470 vs 1,454, a 102.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10 PRO-7850B | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 3,441 | 13,029+279% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 470 | 1,454+209% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The A10 PRO-7850B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7850B versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10 PRO-7850B) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | A10 PRO-7850B | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7850B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The A10 PRO-7850B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7850B targets Business Desktop, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7850B rivals Core i5-4590; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | A10 PRO-7850B | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Business Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10 PRO-7850B was priced at $426, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($426 vs $160), Core i5-10400F was $266 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10 PRO-7850B delivers 8.1 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 163.9% better value option.
| Feature | A10 PRO-7850B | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $160-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 81.4+905% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















