A10G vs Arc A770

CPU

GPU

A10G

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

A10G

24 GB 150

13,598

+2.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

Arc A770

16 GB 225

13,332

0.0%

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

A10G

2021

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
616.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 602.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

A10G

2021

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 602.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
616.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10G better than Arc A770?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 13,598 vs 13,332 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer A10G is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (150W vs 225W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 24 GB instead of 16 GB and 125.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A770 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $349 MSRP. A10G is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. A10G is about 616.3% more expensive on MSRP at $2,500 MSRP versus $349 MSRP, and you are getting 2.0% higher G3D Mark. Arc A770 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Arc A770 make more sense than A10G?

Yes. Arc A770 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $349 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of A10G. The trade-off is that A10G currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark. Arc A770 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

A10G Benchmark Check

Arc A770 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	A10G	Arc A770
1080p
low	262 FPS	222 FPS
medium	251 FPS	207 FPS
high	214 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	200 FPS
medium	202 FPS	169 FPS
high	161 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	134 FPS	136 FPS
medium	110 FPS	114 FPS
high	83 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	84 FPS

Open A10G Open Arc A770

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	A10G	Arc A770
1080p
low	493 FPS	373 FPS
medium	414 FPS	318 FPS
high	328 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	196 FPS
1440p
low	346 FPS	225 FPS
medium	277 FPS	195 FPS
high	225 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	123 FPS
4K
low	182 FPS	104 FPS
medium	151 FPS	89 FPS
high	128 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	56 FPS

Open A10G Open Arc A770

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	A10G	Arc A770
1080p
low	612 FPS	600 FPS
medium	490 FPS	480 FPS
high	408 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	300 FPS
1440p
low	459 FPS	450 FPS
medium	367 FPS	360 FPS
high	306 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	225 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	300 FPS
medium	245 FPS	240 FPS
high	204 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	150 FPS

Open A10G Open Arc A770

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	A10G	Arc A770
1080p
low	612 FPS	600 FPS
medium	490 FPS	480 FPS
high	408 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	300 FPS
1440p
low	459 FPS	450 FPS
medium	367 FPS	360 FPS
high	306 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	225 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	300 FPS
medium	245 FPS	240 FPS
high	204 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	150 FPS

Open A10G Open Arc A770

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Arc A770

A10G

The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The A10G scores 13,598 and the Arc A770 reaches 13,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Arc A770 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 4,096 (Arc A770). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 32 (Arc A770) with 288 Tensor cores vs 512.

Feature	A10G	Arc A770
G3D Mark Score	13,598+2%	13,332
Architecture	Ampere	Generation 12.7
Process Node	8 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	9216+125%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	31.52 TFLOPS+60%	19.66 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz	2400 MHz+40%
ROPs	96	128+33%
TMUs	288+13%	256
L2 Cache	6 MB	16 MB+167%
Ray Tracing Cores	72+125%	32
Tensor Cores	288	512+78%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	A10G	Arc A770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A770 has 16 GB. The A10G offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 16 MB (Arc A770) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	A10G	Arc A770
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+50%	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	6 MB	16 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A770). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	A10G	Arc A770
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770).

Feature	A10G	Arc A770
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	Dual Xe Media Engine
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The A10G draws 150W versus the Arc A770's 225W — a 40% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 650W (Arc A770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.

Feature	A10G	Arc A770
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	500W-23%	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin + 6-pin
Length	267mm	280mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	Unknown-100%	75°C
Perf/Watt	90.7+53%	59.3

💰

Value Analysis

The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Arc A770 launched at $349. The Arc A770 costs 86% less ($2151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 38.2 (Arc A770) — the Arc A770 offers 607.4% better value. The Arc A770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).