A10G vs Titan X Pascal
A10G
Popular choices:
Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The A10G uses modern memory architecture. The A10G likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Titan X Pascal lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Titan X Pascal is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the A10G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Titan X Pascal offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $2,000 for the A10G, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 904.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+904.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Titan X Pascal
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 13,660 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+157% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+187% | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+12% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+29% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+592% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 50% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.
| Feature | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+66% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 and now averages $200. The Titan X Pascal costs 90% less ($1800 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (A10G) vs 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) — the Titan X Pascal offers 904.4% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | A10G | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $1199-52% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $200-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 68.3+904% |
| Codename | GA102 | GP102 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #182 | #198 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on A10G and Titan X Pascal
