A10G vs Intel Arc Pro B60
A10G
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the A10G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel Arc Pro B60 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $450 versus $2,000 for the A10G, it costs 78% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 351.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+351.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Intel Arc Pro B60
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 20 (Intel Arc Pro B60) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 13,807+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+260% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+156% | 12.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2400 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+260% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 82.
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+31% | 69.0 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 and now averages $450. The Intel Arc Pro B60 costs 77.5% less ($1550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (A10G) vs 30.7 (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 351.5% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $500-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $450-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 30.7+351% |
| Codename | GA102 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #182 | #175 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on A10G and Intel Arc Pro B60
