Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

A10G vs RTX A2000

CPUCPUGPUGPU

A10G

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz
Similar parts
···
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A2000

2021Core: 562 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
···
Buy on Amazon

A10G vs RTX A2000 Performance Spectrum

A10G
24 GB 150
13,598
+1.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoTITAN V CEO Edition
brand logoTITAN V
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)
RTX A2000
8 GB 70
13,464
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoTITAN V
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

A10G vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

A10G

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
  • ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌
    455.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
  • ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

RTX A2000

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,050 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 450.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
A10G is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (13,598 vs 13,464), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
A10G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 24 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM and 72 vs 26 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A2000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,050 cheaper on MSRP at $450 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 450.1% (29.9 vs 5.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, RTX A2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, A10G has the stronger long-term case.

A10G vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

A10G

The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The A10G scores 13,598 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 26 (RTX A2000) with 288 Tensor cores vs 104.

FeatureA10GRTX A2000
G3D Mark Score
13,598
13,464
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
Process Node
8 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
9216+177%
3328
Compute (TFLOPS)
31.52 TFLOPS+295%
7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1710 MHz+43%
1200 MHz
ROPs
96+100%
48
TMUs
288+177%
104
L1 Cache
9 MB+173%
3.3 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB+100%
3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
72+177%
26
Tensor Cores
288+177%
104
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The A10G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureA10GRTX A2000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The A10G has 24 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 carries 8 GB. A10G gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the A10G and 128-bit on the RTX A2000. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureA10GRTX A2000
VRAM Capacity
24 GB+200%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB+100%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

FeatureA10GRTX A2000
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).

FeatureA10GRTX A2000
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The A10G draws 150W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.

FeatureA10GRTX A2000
TDP
150W
70W-53%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
167mm
Height
112mm
68mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
Unknown-100%
75°C
Perf/Watt
90.7
192.3+112%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10G came in at $2500, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, RTX A2000 was 82% cheaper ($2050 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 offers 453.7% better value.

FeatureA10GRTX A2000
MSRP
$2500
$450-82%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
29.9+454%
Codename
GA102
GA106
Release
April 12 2021
August 10 2021
Ranking
#182
#186
Search A10G on AmazonSearch RTX A2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.