A10G
GeForce GTX 1650
A10G vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
A10G vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
A10G vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅+72.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1577.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 871% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
A10G vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the A10G leads by 72.8%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+73% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+929% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+956% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+3% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 288+414% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+923% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The A10G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G has 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. A10G gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the A10G and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+500% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 70°C.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 104.9+16% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10G came in at $2500, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 94% cheaper ($2351 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 877.8% better value. The newer card here is A10G (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $149-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 52.8+878% |
| Codename | GA102 | TU117 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #182 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on A10G and GeForce GTX 1650
