A10G vs GeForce RTX 2060
A10G
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the A10G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $2,000 for the A10G, it costs 94% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1629.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1629.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 2060
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the GeForce RTX 2060 reaches 14,114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 288 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 14,114+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+380% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+389% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+2% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 288+140% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+374% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+140% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+20% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The A10G offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+300% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 72.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-6% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+3% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 94% less ($1880 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (A10G) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1629.4% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $349-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $120-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 117.6+1629% |
| Codename | GA102 | TU106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #182 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on A10G and GeForce RTX 2060
