A10G vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
A10G
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The A10G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.3% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (24 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+14.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $2,000 for the A10G, it costs 93% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1066.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1066.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the A10G leads by 14.3%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 288 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+14% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+260% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+251% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1755 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 288+260% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+260% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+260% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+260% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 130W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | 112mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 92.5% less ($1850 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (A10G) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1066.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $249-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $150-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 79.3+1066% |
| Codename | GA102 | GA106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #182 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on A10G and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
