
A10G
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅+26.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1379.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1069.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
A10G
2021GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+26.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1069.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1379.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is A10G better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than A10G?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 121 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the A10G leads by 26.5%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 288 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+27% | 10,749 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+300% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+365% | 6.774 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+16% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 288+300% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+291% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+300% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+300% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The A10G offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+300% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 160mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 153.6+69% |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 93.2% less ($2331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1077.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $169-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 63.6+1078% |
| Codename | GA102 | GA107 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #182 | #252 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













