A10G
GeForce RTX 4070
A10G vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
A10G vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
A10G vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌317.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+98% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 726.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
A10G vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 98%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 288 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 26,919+98% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+57% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+8% | 29.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2475 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+57% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+55% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 36 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+57% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+57% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The A10G does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The A10G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G has 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. A10G gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the A10G and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 36 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 80°C.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 112mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 134.6+48% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10G came in at $2500, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 76% cheaper ($1901 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 731.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $599-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 44.9+731% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #182 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on A10G and GeForce RTX 4070
