A10G vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X
A10G
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10G
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The A10G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (24 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 64X.
| Insight | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | Standard Buffer (0 MB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The A10G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,000 versus $2,200 for the Radeon Pro Vega 64X, it costs 9% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 11.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($2,000) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Radeon Pro Vega 64X
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X reaches 13,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+2% | 13,369 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+125% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+162% | 12.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+16% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+13% | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+800% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The A10G offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 50% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+70% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 and now averages $2200. The A10G costs 9.1% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (A10G) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the A10G offers 11.5% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $2200-12% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000-9% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8+11% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GA102 | Vega 10 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #182 | #190 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on A10G and Radeon Pro Vega 64X
