
A12-9800

Core i7-2710QE
A12-9800 vs Core i7-2710QE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A12-9800 vs Core i7-2710QE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A12-9800 vs Core i7-2710QE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A12-9800
2017Why buy it
- ✅+5.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-2710QE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,695 vs 3,749).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i7-2710QE
2011Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (604 vs 635).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while A12-9800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-2710QE better than A12-9800?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A12-9800 vs Core i7-2710QE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A12-9800
The A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,695 points. Launch price was $139.

Core i7-2710QE
The Core i7-2710QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,749 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2710QE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A12-9800 versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2710QE — a 33.3% clock advantage for the A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-2710QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800 scores 3,695 against the Core i7-2710QE's 3,749 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-2710QE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 635 vs 604, a 5% lead for the A12-9800 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2710QE.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Core i7-2710QE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 3,695 | 3,749+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 635+5% | 604 |
Memory & Platform
The A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2710QE uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A12-9800 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-2710QE — the A12-9800 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A12-9800 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9800) vs 20 (Core i7-2710QE) — the Core i7-2710QE offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A12-9800) and HM65,QM67 (Core i7-2710QE).
| Feature | A12-9800 | Core i7-2710QE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A12-9800) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2710QE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A12-9800) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2710QE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800 targets Budget, Core i7-2710QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: A12-9800 rivals Pentium G4600; Core i7-2710QE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | A12-9800 | Core i7-2710QE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Embedded/Industrial |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















