A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506

AMD

A12-9800

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon L5506

4 Cores4 Thrd60 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A12-9800

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon L5506 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon L5506.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,695 vs 3,706).

Xeon L5506

2009

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 60W instead of 65W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A12-9800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No integrated graphics, while A12-9800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L5506 better than A12-9800?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5506 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A12-9800 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5506 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon L5506 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon L5506 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A12-9800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A12-9800 vs Xeon L5506 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A12-9800

The A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,695 points. Launch price was $139.

Intel

Xeon L5506

The Xeon L5506 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,706 points. Launch price was $125.

Processing Power

Both the A12-9800 and Xeon L5506 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A12-9800 versus 0.13 GHz on the Xeon L5506 — a 188% clock advantage for the A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon L5506 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800 scores 3,695 against the Xeon L5506's 3,706 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon L5506. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon L5506.

FeatureA12-9800Xeon L5506
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+3131%
0.13 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+78%
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark
3,695
3,706
Geekbench 6 Single
635
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5506 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA12-9800Xeon L5506
Socket
AM4
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9800) / not specified (Xeon L5506). The A12-9800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon L5506 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A12-9800 rivals Pentium G4600.

FeatureA12-9800Xeon L5506
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget