A12-9800
VS
Ryzen 3 3250U

A12-9800 vs Ryzen 3 3250U

AMD

A12-9800

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 3250U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A12-9800 is positioned at rank 345 and the Ryzen 3 3250U is on rank 983, so the A12-9800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A12-9800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5062%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4783%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3473%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1046%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
829%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
725%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
415%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
410%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
373%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
373%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
369%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
359%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
354%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
353%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
349%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
100%
#309
Core i9-9900T
MSRP: $423|Avg: $215
100%
#310
Core i5-9500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $132
100%
#311
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#312
Core i9-10940X
MSRP: $784|Avg: $460
98%
#313
Core i9-10920X
MSRP: $689|Avg: $430
98%
#314
Core i7-10700
MSRP: $365|Avg: $268
97%
#315
Core i5-9600K
MSRP: $263|Avg: $178
97%
#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
97%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
97%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
97%
#345
A12-9800
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 3250U

#971
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1973%
#972
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1944%
#973
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1785%
#974
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1777%
#975
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1760%
#977
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1700%
#978
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1630%
#979
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1627%
#980
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1584%
#983
Ryzen 3 3250U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
98%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
97%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
96%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
96%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
95%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
94%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A12-9800 leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 3 3250U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA12-9800Ryzen 3 3250U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA12-9800Ryzen 3 3250U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A12-9800 and Ryzen 3 3250U

AMD

A12-9800

The A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,695 points. Launch price was $139.

AMD

Ryzen 3 3250U

The Ryzen 3 3250U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,718 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 3 3250U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A12-9800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A12-9800 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3250U — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3250U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800 scores 3,695 against the Ryzen 3 3250U's 3,718 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 3250U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3250U.

FeatureA12-9800Ryzen 3 3250U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+20%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+46%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
3,695
3,718
Geekbench 6 Single
635
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3250U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA12-9800Ryzen 3 3250U
Socket
AM4
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9800) / not specified (Ryzen 3 3250U). The A12-9800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen 3 3250U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A12-9800 rivals Pentium G4600.

FeatureA12-9800Ryzen 3 3250U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget