A12-9800 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y

A12-9800 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y Performance Spectrum

A12-9800

4 / 4

3,695

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon Platinum 8452Y

36 / 72

3,641

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A12-9800 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A12-9800 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A12-9800

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8452Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8452Y, which brings 36 cores / 72 threads.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 36 cores / 72 threads.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,641 vs 3,695).
❌361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800.

Quick Answers

So, is A12-9800 better than Xeon Platinum 8452Y?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8452Y makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A12-9800 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A12-9800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A12-9800 still makes the most sense overall. A12-9800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8452Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A12-9800 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A12-9800

The A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,695 points. Launch price was $139.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y

The Xeon Platinum 8452Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,641 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The A12-9800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8452Y has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A12-9800 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8452Y — a 27% clock advantage for the A12-9800 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A12-9800 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800 scores 3,695 against the Xeon Platinum 8452Y's 3,641 — a 1.5% lead for the A12-9800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800 vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	A12-9800	Xeon Platinum 8452Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	36 / 72+800%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+31%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+90%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	67.5 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB (per core)
Process	28 nm	Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	3,695+1%	3,641
Geekbench 6 Single	635	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A12-9800	Xeon Platinum 8452Y
Socket	AM4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9800) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8452Y). The A12-9800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A12-9800 rivals Pentium G4600.