Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro 2000
Mobility Radeon X1350
Popular choices:
Quadro 2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is positioned at rank 708 and the Quadro 2000 is on rank 314, so the Quadro 2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1350
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2270% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (1 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1350.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2270%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2270%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 1322% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1322%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon X1350 and Quadro 2000
Mobility Radeon X1350
The Mobility Radeon X1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1350 scores 40 versus the Quadro 2000's 948 — the Quadro 2000 leads by 2270%. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40 | 948+2270% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+317% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+133% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 256 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon X1350 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 has 1 GB. The Quadro 2000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 1 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 11_0 (Quadro 2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11_0+22% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000). Decoder: AVIVO vs VP4.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | AVIVO | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | AVIVO | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon X1350 draws 50W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 21.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-19% | 62W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 178mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 15.3+1813% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon X1350 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599 and now averages $25. The Mobility Radeon X1350 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 37.9 (Quadro 2000) — the Quadro 2000 offers 1303.7% better value.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon X1350 | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-92% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-40% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 37.9+1304% |
| Codename | Broadway | GF106 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #846 | #902 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon X1350 and Quadro 2000
