Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro 2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro 2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon X1350

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 62W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (40 vs 948).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quadro 2000

2010

Why buy it

✅+2270% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 93.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌24% higher power demand at 62W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 2000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2270% in PassMark G3D (948 vs 40), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon X1350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 2000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $550 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 93.9% (1.6 vs 0.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon X1350 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon X1350 vs Quadro 2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon X1350

The Mobility Radeon X1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon X1350 scores 40 versus the Quadro 2000's 948 — the Quadro 2000 leads by 2270%. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1350	Quadro 2000
G3D Mark Score	40	948+2270%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800+317%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+133%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	80 KB	256 KB+220%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1350	Quadro 2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon X1350 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 carries 1 GB. Quadro 2000 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1350 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1350	Quadro 2000
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	1 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 11_0 (Quadro 2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1350	Quadro 2000
DirectX	9.0c	11_0+22%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000). Decoder: AVIVO vs VP4.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1350	Quadro 2000
Encoder	AVIVO	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	AVIVO	VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon X1350 draws 50W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 21.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1350	Quadro 2000
TDP	50W-19%	62W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	178mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.8	15.3+1813%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon X1350 came in at $49, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1350 was 91.8% cheaper ($550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (Mobility Radeon X1350) vs 1.6 (Quadro 2000) — the Quadro 2000 offers 100% better value.

Feature	Mobility Radeon X1350	Quadro 2000
MSRP	$49-92%	$599
Performance per Dollar	0.8	1.6+100%
Codename	Broadway	GF106
Release	January 7 2010	December 24 2010
Ranking	#846	#902

Search Mobility Radeon X1350 on Amazon

Search Quadro 2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.