A4-1350 vs Pentium T3400

A4-1350 vs Pentium T3400 Performance Spectrum

A4-1350

4 / 4

911

+7.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium T3400

845

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1350 vs Pentium T3400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1350 vs Pentium T3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1350

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Pentium T3400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T3400

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-1350 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (845 vs 911).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while A4-1350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-1350 better than Pentium T3400?

Yes. A4-1350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-1350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-1350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-1350 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-1350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T3400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-1350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-1350 vs Pentium T3400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1350

The A4-1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 911 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium T3400

The Pentium T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 845 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-1350 is built on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A4-1350 scores 911 against the Pentium T3400's 845 — a 7.5% lead for the A4-1350. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1350 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T3400.

Feature	A4-1350	Pentium T3400
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	1 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.16 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	911+8%	845
Geekbench 6 Single	136	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1350 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T3400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-1350	Pentium T3400
Socket	FT3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-1350) / not specified (Pentium T3400). The A4-1350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Pentium T3400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1350 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1350 rivals Atom Z3740.