A4 PRO-7300B vs Core i3-4020Y

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core i3-4020Y Performance Spectrum

A4 PRO-7300B

2 / 2

1,458

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4020Y

2 / 4

1,448

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core i3-4020Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core i3-4020Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 PRO-7300B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4020Y.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4020Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4 PRO-7300B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,448 vs 1,458).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4 PRO-7300B.

Quick Answers

So, is A4 PRO-7300B better than Core i3-4020Y?

Yes. A4 PRO-7300B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4 PRO-7300B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4 PRO-7300B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4 PRO-7300B still makes the most sense overall. A4 PRO-7300B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4 PRO-7300B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4 PRO-7300B vs Core i3-4020Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 PRO-7300B

The A4 PRO-7300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,458 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4020Y

The Core i3-4020Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,448 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-7300B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4020Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4 PRO-7300B versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4020Y — a 90.9% clock advantage for the A4 PRO-7300B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A4 PRO-7300B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4020Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-7300B scores 1,458 against the Core i3-4020Y's 1,448 — a 0.7% lead for the A4 PRO-7300B.

Feature	A4 PRO-7300B	Core i3-4020Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+167%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+153%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,458	1,448
Geekbench 6 Single	375	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-7300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4020Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4 PRO-7300B) vs 12 (Core i3-4020Y) — the A4 PRO-7300B offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4 PRO-7300B) and BGA1168 (Core i3-4020Y).

Feature	A4 PRO-7300B	Core i3-4020Y
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-7300B) vs true (Core i3-4020Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8470D (A4 PRO-7300B) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4020Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-7300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-7300B rivals Pentium G3250.