A6-7310 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2

A6-7310 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 Performance Spectrum

A6-7310

4 / 4

2,689

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-2403 v2

4 / 4

2,672

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7310 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7310 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7310

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R4 Graphics, while Xeon E5-2403 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2403 v2, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,672 vs 2,689).
❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while A6-7310 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7310 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7310 better than Xeon E5-2403 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2403 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A6-7310 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-7310 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7310 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7310 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2403 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A6-7310 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2403 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7310 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

The Xeon E5-2403 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,672 points. Launch price was $223.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-7310 and Xeon E5-2403 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the A6-7310 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6-7310 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7310 scores 2,689 against the Xeon E5-2403 v2's 2,672 — a 0.6% lead for the A6-7310.

Feature	A6-7310	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+33%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,689	2,672

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7310 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7310 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — the A6-7310 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2403 v2 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7310) vs 3 (Xeon E5-2403 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7310) vs 24 (Xeon E5-2403 v2) — the Xeon E5-2403 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-7310	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Socket	FP4	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	384 GB+2300%
RAM Channels	1	3+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7310) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2403 v2). The A6-7310 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2403 v2 targets Server. Direct competitor: A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700.