A6-8500P vs Celeron 3867U

A6-8500P vs Celeron 3867U Performance Spectrum

A6-8500P

2 / 2

1,445

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 3867U

2 / 2

1,449

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-8500P vs Celeron 3867U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-8500P vs Celeron 3867U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-8500P

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,445 vs 1,449).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Celeron 3867U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron 3867U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-8500P better than Celeron 3867U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-8500P is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3867U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3867U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-8500P is the better buy right now. A6-8500P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 3867U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3867U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-8500P vs Celeron 3867U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-8500P

The A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron 3867U

The Celeron 3867U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,449 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-8500P and Celeron 3867U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6-8500P versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3867U — a 50% clock advantage for the A6-8500P (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6-8500P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 3867U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-8500P scores 1,445 against the Celeron 3867U's 1,449 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 3867U.

Feature	A6-8500P	Celeron 3867U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+67%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,445	1,449

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-8500P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 3867U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-8500P versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 3867U — the Celeron 3867U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3867U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-8500P) vs 12 (Celeron 3867U) — the A6-8500P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP4 (A6-8500P) and Kaby Lake-U (Celeron 3867U).

Feature	A6-8500P	Celeron 3867U
Socket	FP4	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-8500P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3867U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-8500P) and HD Graphics 610 (Celeron 3867U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3867U targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-8500P rivals Pentium 3825U; Celeron 3867U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.