A6-8500P vs Core i3-4020Y

A6-8500P vs Core i3-4020Y Performance Spectrum

A6-8500P

2 / 2

1,445

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4020Y

2 / 4

1,448

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-8500P vs Core i3-4020Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-8500P vs Core i3-4020Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-8500P

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,445 vs 1,448).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i3-4020Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-4020Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-8500P better than Core i3-4020Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-8500P is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4020Y pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4020Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-8500P is the better buy right now. A6-8500P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-4020Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-8500P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-8500P vs Core i3-4020Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-8500P

The A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-4020Y

The Core i3-4020Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,448 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-8500P packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4020Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6-8500P versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4020Y — a 66.7% clock advantage for the A6-8500P (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A6-8500P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4020Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-8500P scores 1,445 against the Core i3-4020Y's 1,448 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-4020Y.

Feature	A6-8500P	Core i3-4020Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+100%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+7%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,445	1,448

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-8500P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4020Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-8500P) vs 12 (Core i3-4020Y) — the A6-8500P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP4 (A6-8500P) and BGA1168 (Core i3-4020Y).

Feature	A6-8500P	Core i3-4020Y
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	1600
Max RAM Capacity	16	16
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-8500P) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4020Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-8500P rivals Pentium 3825U.