
A6-8500P vs Xeon X5272

A6-8500P

Xeon X5272
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-8500P is positioned at rank 992 and the Xeon X5272 is on rank 1029, so the A6-8500P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-8500P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5272
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-8500P | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($16) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($76) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-8500P | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+373%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($16) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($76) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-8500P and Xeon X5272

A6-8500P
The A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon X5272
The Xeon X5272 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The A6-8500P is built on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the A6-8500P scores 1,445 against the Xeon X5272's 1,451 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X5272.
| Feature | A6-8500P | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz+112% |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB | — |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | — |
| PassMark | 1,445 | 1,451 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-8500P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5272 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-8500P versus DDR2 on the Xeon X5272 — the A6-8500P supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon X5272 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A6-8500P) vs 4 (Xeon X5272). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-8500P) vs 0 (Xeon X5272) — the A6-8500P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP4 (A6-8500P) and Intel 5100,Intel 5400 (Xeon X5272).
| Feature | A6-8500P | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+79900% | DDR2 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 128 GB+838860700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The A6-8500P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Xeon X5272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5272 targets Server. Direct competitor: A6-8500P rivals Pentium 3825U.
| Feature | A6-8500P | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The A6-8500P launched at $100 MSRP, while the Xeon X5272 debuted at $1172. At current prices ($16 vs $76), the A6-8500P is $60 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-8500P delivers 90.3 pts/$ vs 19.1 pts/$ for the Xeon X5272 — making the A6-8500P the 130.2% better value option.
| Feature | A6-8500P | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-91% | $1172 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $16-79% | $76 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.3+373% | 19.1 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












