A6-8500P vs Pentium M 735

AMD

A6-8500P

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 735

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······

A6-8500P vs Pentium M 735 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-8500P vs Pentium M 735 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-8500P vs Pentium M 735: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-8500P

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $194 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
  • Delivers 191.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 21W, a 20W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Pentium M 735 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,445 vs 1,459).

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 2000% higher power demand at 21W vs 1W.
  • No integrated graphics, while A6-8500P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-8500P better than Pentium M 735?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-8500P is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A6-8500P is the better buy right now. A6-8500P comes in $194 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium M 735 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 191.2% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 5.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-8500P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-8500P vs Pentium M 735 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A6-8500P

The A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A6-8500P packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A6-8500P has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6-8500P versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 55.3% clock advantage for the A6-8500P (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The A6-8500P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6-8500P scores 1,445 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 1% lead for the Pentium M 735.

FeatureA6-8500PPentium M 735
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3 GHz+76%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
2 MB+100%
Process
28 nm-69%
90 nm
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
1,445
1,459
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-8500P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-8500P versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 — the A6-8500P supports -580.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-8500P supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A6-8500P) vs 1 (Pentium M 735). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-8500P) vs 0 (Pentium M 735) — the A6-8500P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA6-8500PPentium M 735
Socket
FP4
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1600
DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+700%
2 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-8500P) vs None (Pentium M 735). The A6-8500P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy. Direct competitor: A6-8500P rivals Pentium 3825U.

FeatureA6-8500PPentium M 735
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
None
Target Use
Mobile Legacy
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-8500P was priced at $100, while the Pentium M 735 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($100 vs $294), A6-8500P was $194 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-8500P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 5.0 pts/$ for the Pentium M 735 — making the A6-8500P the 97.7% better value option.

FeatureA6-8500PPentium M 735
MSRP
$100-66%
$294
Performance per Dollar
14.4+188%
5.0
Release Date
2015
2004

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.