A6-9225
VS
Celeron N2840

A6-9225 vs Celeron N2840

AMD

A6-9225

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Celeron N2840

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.58 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9225 is positioned at rank 830 and the Celeron N2840 is on rank 157, so the Celeron N2840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9225

#818
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1320%
#819
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1300%
#820
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1194%
#821
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1188%
#822
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1178%
#824
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1137%
#825
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1090%
#826
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1089%
#827
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1059%
#830
A6-9225
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2840

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
99%
#145
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
331%
#146
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
326%
#147
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
299%
#148
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
298%
#149
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
295%
#151
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
285%
#152
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
273%
#153
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
273%
#154
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
265%
#157
Celeron N2840
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9225 (2018) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9225Celeron N2840
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron N2840 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9225Celeron N2840
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9225 and Celeron N2840

AMD

A6-9225

The A6-9225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,334 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron N2840

The Celeron N2840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the A6-9225 and Celeron N2840 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A6-9225 versus 2.58 GHz on the Celeron N2840 — a 18.3% clock advantage for the A6-9225 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.16 GHz). The A6-9225 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N2840 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9225 scores 1,334 against the Celeron N2840's 1,331 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-9225.

FeatureA6-9225Celeron N2840
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+20%
2.58 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+20%
2.16 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,334
1,331
Geekbench 6 Single
230
Geekbench 6 Multi
430
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9225 uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2840 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9225 versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2840 — the A6-9225 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9225) vs 2 (Celeron N2840). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9225) vs 4 (Celeron N2840) — the A6-9225 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9225) and SoC (Celeron N2840).

FeatureA6-9225Celeron N2840
Socket
BGA
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8+100%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9225) / VT-x (Celeron N2840). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R4 (A6-9225) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2840) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2840 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2840 rivals AMD A6-6310.

FeatureA6-9225Celeron N2840
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R4
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Netbook