
A8-3820 vs Celeron G5900T

A8-3820

Celeron G5900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A8-3820 is positioned at rank #1032 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-3820
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-3820 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-3820 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+303%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-3820 and Celeron G5900T

A8-3820
The A8-3820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,178 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron G5900T
The Celeron G5900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,192 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A8-3820 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G5900T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3820 has 2 more cores. The A8-3820 is built on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the A8-3820 scores 2,178 against the Celeron G5900T's 2,192 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G5900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 354 vs 748, a 71.5% lead for the Celeron G5900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3820 vs 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5900T.
| Feature | A8-3820 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | — |
| PassMark | 2,178 | 2,192 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 354 | 748+111% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 750 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-3820 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G5900T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A8-3820 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900T — the Celeron G5900T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3820) vs 16 (Celeron G5900T) — the A8-3820 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A8-3820) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900T).
| Feature | A8-3820 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2666+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3820) vs VT-x (Celeron G5900T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6550D (A8-3820) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3820 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron G5900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-3820 rivals Core i3-2120; Celeron G5900T rivals Pentium Gold G6400T.
| Feature | A8-3820 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6550D | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The A8-3820 launched at $280 MSRP, while the Celeron G5900T debuted at $42. At current prices ($200 vs $50), the Celeron G5900T is $150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-3820 delivers 10.9 pts/$ vs 43.8 pts/$ for the Celeron G5900T — making the Celeron G5900T the 120.4% better value option.
| Feature | A8-3820 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $280 | $42-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $50-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9 | 43.8+302% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












