A8-3820 vs Celeron G5900T

CPU

GPU

A8-3820

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2011

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G5900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2020

Buy on Amazon

A8-3820 vs Celeron G5900T Performance Spectrum

A8-3820

4 / 4

2,178

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G5900T

2 / 2

2,192

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3820 vs Celeron G5900T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3820 vs Celeron G5900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3820

2011

Why buy it

✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G5900T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (354 vs 748).
❌Lower PassMark (2,178 vs 2,192).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 52.2 PassMark/$ ($280 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Celeron G5900T

2020

Why buy it

✅+111.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $238 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $280 MSRP).
✅Delivers 571.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.2 vs 7.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $280 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-3820.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5900T better than A8-3820?

Yes. Celeron G5900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G5900T comes in $238 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $280 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 571.0% better value on MSRP (52.2 vs 7.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3820 vs Celeron G5900T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3820

The A8-3820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,178 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron G5900T

The Celeron G5900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,192 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3820 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G5900T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3820 has 2 more cores. The A8-3820 is built on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the A8-3820 scores 2,178 against the Celeron G5900T's 2,192 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G5900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 354 vs 748, a 71.5% lead for the Celeron G5900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3820 vs 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5900T.

Feature	A8-3820	Celeron G5900T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	—
PassMark	2,178	2,192
Geekbench 6 Single	354	748+111%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	750

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3820 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G5900T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A8-3820 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900T — the Celeron G5900T supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3820) vs 16 (Celeron G5900T) — the A8-3820 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A8-3820) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900T).

Feature	A8-3820	Celeron G5900T
Socket	FM1	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2666+43%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3820) vs VT-x (Celeron G5900T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6550D (A8-3820) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3820 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron G5900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-3820 rivals Core i3-2120; Celeron G5900T rivals Pentium Gold G6400T.

Feature	A8-3820	Celeron G5900T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6550D	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Budget Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A8-3820 was priced at $280, while the Celeron G5900T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($280 vs $42), Celeron G5900T was $238 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-3820 delivers 7.8 pts/$ vs 52.2 pts/$ for the Celeron G5900T — making the Celeron G5900T the 148.1% better value option.

Feature	A8-3820	Celeron G5900T
MSRP	$280	$42-85%
Performance per Dollar	7.8	52.2+569%
Release Date	2011	2020

Search A8-3820 on Amazon

Search Celeron G5900T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.