A8-3820 vs Pentium G4400TE

CPU

GPU

A8-3820

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Pentium G4400TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A8-3820 vs Pentium G4400TE Performance Spectrum

A8-3820

4 / 4

2,178

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G4400TE

2 / 2

2,190

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3820 vs Pentium G4400TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3820 vs Pentium G4400TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3820

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($280 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G4400TE.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,178 vs 2,190).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Pentium G4400TE

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
7.1% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$280 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-3820.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G4400TE better than A8-3820?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-3820 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400TE pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G4400TE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G4400TE comes in 7.1% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $280 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. A8-3820 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 6.6% better value on paper (7.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G4400TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3820 vs Pentium G4400TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3820

The A8-3820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,178 points. Launch price was $90.

Pentium G4400TE

The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3820 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3820 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A8-3820 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE — a 15.4% clock advantage for the A8-3820. The A8-3820 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G4400TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3820 scores 2,178 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium G4400TE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3820 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE.

Feature	A8-3820	Pentium G4400TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+17%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,178	2,190
Geekbench 6 Single	354	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3820 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4400TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A8-3820 versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4400TE — the Pentium G4400TE supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4400TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3820) vs 16 (Pentium G4400TE) — the A8-3820 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-3820	Pentium G4400TE
Socket	FM1	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3820) vs VT-x (Pentium G4400TE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6550D (A8-3820) and HD Graphics 510 (Pentium G4400TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3820 targets Budget Desktop, Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3820 rivals Core i3-2120.

Feature	A8-3820	Pentium G4400TE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6550D	HD Graphics 510
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Budget Desktop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A8-3820 was priced at $280, while the Pentium G4400TE came in at $300. On launch pricing ($280 vs $300), A8-3820 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-3820 delivers 7.8 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400TE — making the A8-3820 the 6.3% better value option.

Feature	A8-3820	Pentium G4400TE
MSRP	$280-7%	$300
Performance per Dollar	7.8+7%	7.3
Release Date	2011	2015

Search A8-3820 on Amazon

Search Pentium G4400TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.