A8-3820 vs Core 2 Duo P7370

A8-3820 vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Performance Spectrum

A8-3820

4 / 4

2,178

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo P7370

2 / 2

2,191

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3820 vs Core 2 Duo P7370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3820 vs Core 2 Duo P7370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3820

2011

Why buy it

✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6550D, while Core 2 Duo P7370 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo P7370.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,178 vs 2,191).
❌Launch MSRP is still $280 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P7370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P7370

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3820 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-3820.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-3820 better than Core 2 Duo P7370?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-3820 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-3820 is the better buy right now. A8-3820 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $280 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo P7370 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-3820 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-3820 vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3820

The A8-3820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,178 points. Launch price was $90.

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3820 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3820 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A8-3820 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the A8-3820 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A8-3820 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3820 scores 2,178 against the Core 2 Duo P7370's 2,191 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7370. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3820 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370.

Feature	A8-3820	Core 2 Duo P7370
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	3 MB+200%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,178	2,191
Geekbench 6 Single	354	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3820 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A8-3820 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — the A8-3820 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-3820 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3820) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo P7370) — the A8-3820 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A8-3820) and Mobile (Core 2 Duo P7370).

Feature	A8-3820	Core 2 Duo P7370
Socket	FM1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+75%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3820) vs false (Core 2 Duo P7370). The A8-3820 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3820 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3820 rivals Core i3-2120.