A8-3820 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

CPU

GPU

A8-3820

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2011

Buy on Amazon

Core 2 Quad Q9505

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 0.83 GHz2009

Buy on Amazon

A8-3820 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505 Performance Spectrum

A8-3820

4 / 4

2,178

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Quad Q9505

4 / 4

2,176

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3820 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3820 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3820

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6550D, while Core 2 Quad Q9505 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Quad Q9505.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($280 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).

Core 2 Quad Q9505

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $67 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $280 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.2 vs 7.8 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $280 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,176 vs 2,178).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3820 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-3820.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-3820 better than Core 2 Quad Q9505?

Yes. A8-3820 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-3820 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-3820 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-3820 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-3820 comes in 31.5% more expensive on MSRP at $280 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Quad Q9505 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 31.3% better value on paper (10.2 vs 7.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-3820 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3820 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3820

The A8-3820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,178 points. Launch price was $90.

Core 2 Quad Q9505

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-3820 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A8-3820 versus 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — a 108.5% clock advantage for the A8-3820 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The A8-3820 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3820 scores 2,178 against the Core 2 Quad Q9505's 2,176 — a 0.1% lead for the A8-3820. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3820 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9505.

Feature	A8-3820	Core 2 Quad Q9505
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+237%	0.83 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.83 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	6 MB (total)+500%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark	2,178	2,176
Geekbench 6 Single	354	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3820 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A8-3820 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — the A8-3820 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-3820 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3820) vs 0 (Core 2 Quad Q9505) — the A8-3820 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-3820	Core 2 Quad Q9505
Socket	FM1	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3820) vs VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q9505). The A8-3820 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3820 targets Budget Desktop, Core 2 Quad Q9505 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3820 rivals Core i3-2120.

Feature	A8-3820	Core 2 Quad Q9505
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6550D	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Budget Desktop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A8-3820 was priced at $280, while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($280 vs $213), Core 2 Quad Q9505 was $67 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-3820 delivers 7.8 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — making the Core 2 Quad Q9505 the 27.1% better value option.

Feature	A8-3820	Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP	$280	$213-24%
Performance per Dollar	7.8	10.2+31%
Release Date	2011	2009

Search A8-3820 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Quad Q9505 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.